Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and accompanying images discuss a legal and ethical issue regarding the unauthorized use of a famous person's voice, drawing a parallel between a historical case (Midler v. Ford Motor Co.) and a contemporary situation involving Scarlett Johansson and OpenAI. The tone is informative and analytical, aiming to highlight the recurring nature of such disputes and their implications for companies.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on factual information and legal precedents. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing unnecessary personal details. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by explaining the context and significance of the issue. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by analyzing the actions of companies and their potential legal and ethical missteps without resorting to ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight an important societal issue, thereby contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.