The statement by Gary Marcus addresses the societal impact of AI, critiquing its current trajectory and suggesting alternative, more beneficial applications. The tone is critical and somewhat provocative, aiming to highlight the negative consequences of AI while acknowledging positive potential uses.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but critiques the broader application of AI technologies. It aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for more ethical uses of AI.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the negative and positive potential of AI. However, the use of strong language ('shitty path') may detract from a tone of empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI's current applications. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the broader implications of AI technology.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for the ethical use of AI in science, education, and medicine, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important societal issues related to AI.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.