Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement engages in a public discourse by addressing the ethical and practical implications of AI development, particularly in relation to its impact on jobs and accessibility for the visually impaired. The tone is critical and suggests a preference for AI applications that benefit society rather than harm it.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for AI applications that assist the visually impaired, which is a positive use of technology. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the needs of the blind community and suggesting beneficial uses of AI. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of current AI applications, although it does include a somewhat negative remark about AI taking artists' jobs and doing a bad job at it. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by suggesting more ethical and beneficial uses of AI. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important societal issues. [+2]