Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the influence of money on scientific integrity, which is a matter of public concern. The tone is reflective and somewhat critical, aiming to highlight a perceived problem in the scientific community. The intent appears to be to raise awareness and provoke thought about the issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique of a systemic issue rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to the issue of financial influence on science. However, it could do more to foster empathy and compassion by suggesting solutions or ways to address the problem. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a systemic issue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.