Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
5/21/2024, 8:00:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Avik Dey
@AvikonHadoop
·
622d
@GaryMarcus @kevin_scott the blade of that hockey stick seems to end right at 2024 though.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
622d
Dear Microsoft CTO @Kevin_Scott,

Want to put money on what you just said?

$100,000?

— @GaryMarcus
Andrew Curran
@AndrewCurran_
·
622d
'we are nowhere near the point of diminishing marginal returns on how powerful we can make AI models as we increase the scale of compute'

The statement 'I don’t think it has carried through to 2024 tbh' is part of a broader discussion about the future of AI models and their computational power. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the trajectory of AI advancements, referencing a graph showing the growth of compute in AI models, and a bet on the future of AI development. This discussion touches on public issues related to technological advancements, AI capabilities, and their implications, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a personal opinion about the trajectory of AI advancements. It is neutral and does not violate this principle.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is part of a broader discussion that can promote understanding and dialogue about AI advancements. It does not directly promote empathy or compassion but contributes to a constructive conversation. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a respectful disagreement about the future of AI. [+1]