The statement criticizes the media's handling of stories related to alleged Russian ties, suggesting that the industry has adopted a standard of publishing unverified or false information. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to highlight perceived flaws in journalistic practices. The images provided serve as examples to support the argument. The conversation refers to a specific instance where a news outlet allegedly fabricated a story, further emphasizing the claim of widespread misinformation.
- The statement aims to expose what the author perceives as harmful practices in journalism, which could be seen as an attempt to do no harm by advocating for better standards. However, the accusatory tone and use of strong language like 'horseshit' could be seen as harmful in itself. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does accuse the media of significant misconduct, which could be seen as disrespectful to the individuals involved in those stories. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards those who may have been wrongfully accused due to false reporting, but it does so in a confrontational manner.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it makes broad accusations against the media industry. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to call for better journalistic standards, which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.