Matt Taibbi

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing the credibility and integrity of mainstream media, particularly in relation to reporting on Russiagate and related stories. The tone is critical and skeptical of the mainstream media, suggesting that it has become standard practice to publish unverified or false information if it serves a particular narrative.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement and conversation aim to highlight perceived issues in media integrity, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by calling out potential misinformation. However, the tone is accusatory and could contribute to public distrust in media without providing constructive solutions.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy of individuals but criticizes the media industry broadly. It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as contributing to a hostile environment towards journalists.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism and does not offer a balanced view or acknowledge the complexities of media reporting. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not foster constructive dialogue. It makes broad accusations without engaging with specific counterarguments or providing evidence for its claims. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion about the media, aiming to hold it accountable. However, it does so in a manner that may undermine trust in journalism without offering constructive pathways for improvement.