Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
5/22/2024, 12:27:03 AM
X
In reply to:
Kevin Scott
@kevin_scott
·
622d
@GaryMarcus I think I already am. Way more than $100k. 😁.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
622d
Dear Microsoft CTO @Kevin_Scott,

Want to put money on what you just said?

$100,000?

— @GaryMarcus
Andrew Curran
@AndrewCurran_
·
622d
'we are nowhere near the point of diminishing marginal returns on how powerful we can make AI models as we increase the scale of compute'

The statement and the preceding conversation involve a discussion about the advancements in AI models and a light-hearted challenge regarding a monetary wager on the accuracy of a claim. The tone is playful and informal, and the content revolves around the capabilities and future potential of AI technology. While the conversation touches on a public issue (the development and impact of AI), the specific statement in question is more of a humorous remark rather than a substantive engagement with the topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and maintains a respectful tone. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses humor to promote a light-hearted interaction, which can foster understanding and empathy in a casual context. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a playful manner without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]