In reply to:
muchwowindeed
@muchwowindeed
·
622d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
622d
The statement and the linked Wikipedia article reference a legal case, Midler v. Ford Motor Co., which is relevant to the ongoing discussion about the use of a voice actor (VA) and issues of consent and legality. This conversation touches on public issues related to intellectual property, consent, and ethical practices in media and technology. The tone of the conversation is somewhat confrontational, with accusations of lying and unethical behavior.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but engages in a heated debate, which could escalate tensions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but engages in a public dispute that could affect the dignity of those involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on argumentation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively, leaning towards personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.