Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
5/22/2024, 1:23:50 AM
X
In reply to:
muchwowindeed
@muchwowindeed
·
622d
@Moonlogic_Games @GaryMarcus @theinformation the voice? no way

the intonation kinda sounds like her, but it's an extremely generic sassy/enthusiastic intonation anyone can perform

there's no way she's the only person on earth who's allowed to talk like that
Moonlogic
@Moonlogic_Games
·
622d
@muchwowindeed @GaryMarcus @theinformation It sounded like her (to me) and Mr. Altman implied it by making a reference to her character in a tweet. That, combined with the fact that they approached her twice for her consent, but proceeded without it... Not a good look.
muchwowindeed
@muchwowindeed
·
622d
@GaryMarcus @theinformation cry about it, they used a real VA so there's no way this would hold up in court

they said they were "pausing" the voice because they're probably bringing it back 🙂
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
622d
Way to excuse blatant lying and proceeding without consent, @theinformation

#ScarlettSaidNo

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a public discourse about the ethical and legal implications of using a voice actor's performance without consent. The discussion touches on issues of intellectual property, consent, and the responsibilities of companies in their use of creative works.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises awareness about potential harm caused by using someone's voice without consent. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by focusing on the legal case and its implications rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing a reference to a legal case that is relevant to the discussion, encouraging informed dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the ethical concerns without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight an important issue related to consent and intellectual property, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]