Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement critiques a claim made by Microsoft regarding the invention of the Personal Computer (PC) and seeks to correct the historical record by referencing other early computer manufacturers. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and critical, aiming to challenge the accuracy of Microsoft's statement. The intent is to engage in a public discussion about the history of computing and to ensure that credit is given where it is due.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual correction rather than a personal attack. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by attempting to correct a perceived historical inaccuracy. However, the sarcastic tone may detract from empathy and compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the accuracy of Microsoft's claim. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public issue. [+1]