Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement by @GaryMarcus, 'Indeed, and in many ways that’s what my new book is about; I reached the same conclusions,' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive issue related to AI and the presence of malignant narcissists in the field. The statement is part of a broader conversation about the societal impact of AI and the behavior of individuals within that space.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by aligning with the previous discussion and indicating that the book addresses similar conclusions, fostering empathy and compassion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, and it supports constructive dialogue by contributing to the conversation. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By referencing a book that presumably addresses these issues, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]