Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/22/2024, 1:41:27 PM
X
In reply to:
Dom Riccobene
@DomRiccobene
·
623d
@GaryMarcus I don’t know Mr. Marcus. YouTube guy clearly says number go up 🤷‍♂️
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
623d
2020-2023: With scaling laws we can precisely predict the capabilities of our future models

2024: Oops, we have fallen off the curve, but we just saw a demo that I haven’t actually tried yet that has a bunch of other different stuff that looks like it will be cool! https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/s…
Chuck Russell
@cichuck
·
623d
@davetroy @GaryMarcus The 'lack of any kind exponential progress' (linear) isn't a plateau.

using 'new input/output channels' and implementing new 'use cases' is the very definition of a transformative tech.

The statement by @GaryMarcus, 'That’s Kevin Scott; I offered him a $100,000 public bet (see my posts yesterday) but he declined,' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about AI progress and challenges, referencing a public bet to highlight differing opinions on the topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the mention of a declined bet could be seen as a challenge or provocation, which might indirectly cause reputational harm. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects privacy and dignity. Adheres well. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on highlighting a disagreement. Neutral.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of public challenge but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It sticks to the topic of the bet and the disagreement. Adheres well. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes in this statement. Neutral.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight a public debate on AI progress, which can be seen as contributing to societal understanding of the issue. Adheres well. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public debate responsibly. Adheres well. [+2]