The statement addresses the public issue of 'cancellation' and credibility, particularly in the context of Sam Altman. It critiques Altman's credibility and implies that his past actions have led to a loss of trust, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a negative perception of Sam Altman. It does not use inflammatory language, so it partially upholds this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question Altman's credibility in a public forum, which could be seen as a violation of his dignity. This partially violates the principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and dismissive, which violates this principle. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a personal attack on Altman's credibility without providing a constructive basis for discussion, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.