The statement addresses the current state of large language models (LLMs) and critiques the focus of big tech companies on this technology. It suggests that there has been a lack of investment in alternative approaches and implies that competing methods were discouraged. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant issue in the field of technology and artificial intelligence, which has broad societal implications.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It critiques a technological approach rather than individuals or groups, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting a perceived issue in the tech industry. However, it could be more constructive by suggesting alternatives or solutions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of big tech's focus on LLMs but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a focus on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By critiquing the current focus on LLMs and suggesting a need for broader investment in technology, the statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly critique a significant issue in the tech industry. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.