The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue—electoral reform in the United States. It promotes a specific policy proposal (ranked-choice voting) and references a public figure's detailed argument on the topic.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. It is neutral and informative. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging viewers to watch a TED Talk that explains the concept of ranked-choice voting and its potential benefits. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the policy proposal and its merits. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to promote a discussion on electoral reform, which could be beneficial for society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing a link to a reputable source (TED Talk) for further information. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.