Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the direction of AI innovation and the focus on large language models (LLMs) by big tech companies. The tone is supportive of Gary Marcus's critique and calls for a push towards varied AI innovations.
- The statement does not use harmful language and supports a constructive critique, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by agreeing with Gary Marcus and suggesting a positive direction for AI innovation, thus aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by supporting an existing critique and suggesting an alternative approach, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, thus aligning with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of AI innovation, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public debate on AI innovation, aligning with the principle of responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.