In reply to:
Alex Volkov (Thursd/AI)
@altryne
·
624d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the state of large language models (LLMs) and the direction of technological investments, which are public issues in the field of artificial intelligence.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a response to a discussion and does not contain harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of a rebuttal or a continuation of a debate.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue but could be seen as slightly dismissive or condescending ('I can’t help it that you were left holding the door'). It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but the tone could be more constructive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. It contributes to the ongoing debate about LLMs and technological investments. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.