Matt Stoller
@matthewstoller
·
625d
The statement 'Hoo boy. ScarJo was just the beginning.' in response to a tweet about Sony Music's accusations against Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI for using its songs to develop AI systems constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue related to intellectual property rights, AI development, and the music industry.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as sensationalizing the issue, which might contribute to public anxiety or misunderstanding. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of a reactionary comment. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a reactionary comment without substantive engagement. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society. It is a reactionary comment without constructive input. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity. It is a reactionary comment without substantive engagement. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.