Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the transparency and ethical practices of OpenAI, a significant entity in the tech industry. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived inconsistencies and dishonesty in OpenAI's statements and actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('Bullshit') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of OpenAI's leadership, which could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it is accusatory and dismissive. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments by calling the statements 'Bullshit.' [-2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes; it is purely critical.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to highlight issues within a significant organization, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment, but the approach is not constructive. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its accusatory and inflammatory tone. [-1]