In reply to:
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
626d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the progress and benchmarks of AI models, which is a public issue. The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to provide a counterpoint to the optimistic claims about AI advancements.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive debate about AI progress. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a different perspective on AI benchmarks and progress. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the content of the argument rather than the individuals involved. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.