Joseph Carlson
@joecarlsonshow
·
627d
The statement criticizes a public figure's opinion on a legal and ethical issue related to intellectual property and consent, specifically regarding the use of a voice similar to Scarlett Johansson's. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, aiming to correct what the author perceives as a significant misunderstanding of the law and ethical considerations.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses a confrontational tone and dismisses the other person's understanding harshly, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of the other person by calling their take 'startlingly bad' and implying ignorance. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticizing the other person's viewpoint. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a dismissive tone and does not provide a detailed explanation of the issues it raises. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on criticizing the other person's viewpoint.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, given its confrontational and dismissive tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.