In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
627d
Sami Taha
@tahainnovate
·
627d
The statement 'Plagiarism *is* a serious claim, and I do not make it lately. I have documented the evidence elsewhere. An early attempt is here, but I have uncovered much more, which I will share in due course if he doesn’t apologize.' by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it addresses a serious accusation of plagiarism within the context of AI research, a significant public issue. The reply '@tahainnovate @ylecun *lightly' does not substantively engage with the public issue and appears to be a lighthearted or dismissive comment.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus strives to do no harm by providing evidence for the serious claim of plagiarism, although the tone is accusatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the professional actions rather than personal attacks, but it does involve a serious accusation which can impact reputations. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing evidence and promising further details, but it could be seen as lacking empathy and compassion due to its accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue of plagiarism, but it could be seen as a personal attack due to the direct accusation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.