In reply to:
Vincent Valentine (CEO of Cognitive.ai)
@BitValentine
·
628d
The statement engages in a public discourse about intellectual property and plagiarism within the context of AI research. It accuses a prominent figure of failing to cite predecessors and implies that this behavior is a form of plagiarism. The tone is accusatory and critical.
- The statement aims to hold someone accountable for their actions, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by promoting ethical behavior in academia. However, the accusatory tone may cause harm to the individual's reputation. (+1, -1)Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual it accuses, as it publicly calls them out for alleged misconduct. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on criticism without offering a constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks by directly accusing someone of plagiarism without providing a platform for constructive criticism or dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.