In reply to:
You should be doing something else
@SQLnotSQL
·
628d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
628d
The statement by @SQLnotSQL engages in a public discussion about the capabilities and limitations of commercial AI systems, specifically Waymo. The tone is skeptical and somewhat humorous, aiming to challenge the previous assertion about AI's ability to interpret complex scenarios like a 'Wile E Coyote prank.'
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a light-hearted challenge rather than a harmful critique. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement uses humor to promote understanding and skepticism about AI capabilities, which can foster a more informed public discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the previous assertion without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to contribute to the public discourse on AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.