Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses a public issue related to the ethical use of generative AI and the need for federal protections, making it a part of public discourse. It highlights a specific incident involving a public figure and a tech company, raising concerns about consent and privacy.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It reports on a public figure's call for legal protections, which is a constructive action. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Scarlett Johansson by reporting her concerns without engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By bringing attention to the issue of consent and the ethical use of AI, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards individuals whose likenesses might be used without permission. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue at hand and the actions of the involved parties. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant societal issue, potentially contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for legal protections. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly by addressing a relevant public concern with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.