Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement raises concerns about universities' investments in weapons and the use of militarized police against students, aligning with union members' protests. It questions the ethical implications of such investments and actions, contributing to public discourse on university policies and social justice.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by university investments in weapons and the use of militarized police, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by drawing attention to the concerns of students and union members. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of university policies without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for social justice and ethical considerations in university investments. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds the principles of free speech by raising important questions about public policies and actions. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.