The statement 'Remember how I told you a couple years ago that LLMs suck? They still do.' is a critical comment on the performance of language models (LLMs). It is part of a broader conversation that includes a critique of AI-generated content, as evidenced by the images showing problematic AI responses. This statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI reliability and safety.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive and unconstructive. It does not offer a solution or a constructive critique, which could be more beneficial.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement lacks empathy and compassion. It is dismissive and does not consider the efforts of those working on improving LLMs.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks. However, it could be more constructive in its criticism.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses the platform to voice a critical opinion, which can be valuable for public discourse. However, it could be more responsible by offering constructive feedback.
[+1]