Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 177

The statement addresses a significant public issue, specifically the conflict between Israel and Palestine, and questions the actions of a prominent political figure, President Biden. The tone is critical and seeks to hold a public figure accountable for their stance on a serious humanitarian issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language ('genocide') which could be seen as inflammatory. This could potentially escalate tensions rather than promote peaceful discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of the term 'genocide' is a serious accusation that could be seen as disrespectful to the complexity of the issue. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote empathy and compassion for the Palestinian population by highlighting their plight and calling for action. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement criticizes President Biden's inaction but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on his policy stance rather than his character. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to draw attention to a significant humanitarian issue, which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to raise awareness about a critical issue, though the language could be more measured to maintain integrity. [+1]