The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the role of social companies in managing information related to the origins of Covid-19 and implies state influence on these actions. The tone is accusatory and suggests a conspiracy, which can be polarizing.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies wrongdoing by social companies and an unnamed state actor, which could contribute to public distrust and tension. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad accusations without specific evidence, which can be seen as a minor violation of respecting the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters suspicion and division. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes an accusatory claim without providing a platform for discussion or evidence. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, as it makes serious accusations without substantiating them. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.