The statement expresses concern about the composition of the U.S. Government AI Safety and Security board, suggesting that it should include experts on ethics rather than corporate leaders. The tone is cautionary and critical, aiming to highlight potential conflicts of interest and the importance of ethical considerations in AI governance.
- The statement aims to do no harm by raising awareness about potential risks associated with AI governance, which aligns with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in personal attacks or harassment. It focuses on the roles and qualifications of the board members rather than their personal attributes. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the importance of ethical considerations in AI governance, which is crucial for societal well-being. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the qualifications of the board members and suggesting an alternative approach. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for a focus on ethics in AI governance, which is a responsible use of influence. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.