Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement describes a violent event involving the Israeli army and displaced Palestinians in Rafah, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue. The tone is serious and the intent appears to be to inform and possibly evoke a reaction regarding the described event.
- The statement aims to inform about a tragic event, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by raising awareness. However, the graphic nature of the description could potentially cause emotional distress. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a serious accusation against the Israeli army, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote empathy and compassion for the victims by highlighting their suffering. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to inform about a public issue, but the inclusion of a link to 'x.com' without context could be seen as irresponsible if the linked content is not credible or relevant.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.