Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement 'This is not a war. This is a genocide.' is a strong and emotionally charged assertion in response to a report about air strikes resulting in the deaths of Palestinians. The statement engages with a significant public issue, namely the conflict between Israel and Palestine, and thus constitutes public discourse.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than calming them. This could be seen as doing harm with words, thus violating Principle 1. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the use of the term 'genocide' is highly charged and could be seen as disrespectful to those involved in the conflict, potentially violating Principle 2. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it makes a severe accusation that could polarize opinions further, thus violating Principle 3. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong accusation without providing a basis for discussion or understanding, thus violating Principle 4. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, given the potential for escalating conflict and misunderstanding, thus violating Principle 7. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.