Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 177

The statement addresses a serious public issue involving international conflict and potential violations of international law. It references actions taken by a judicial body (the International Court of Justice) and describes alleged military actions and their consequences. The tone is urgent and accusatory, aiming to draw attention to the severity of the situation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight harm being done, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone could potentially incite further conflict or hostility.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make serious allegations that could impact the dignity of those involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does aim to raise awareness of a serious issue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of an accusatory declaration without room for discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a significant issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to address a public concern, but the integrity of the information and the way it is presented could be questioned.