Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/28/2024, 1:44:10 AM
X
In reply to:
Nirvaan Ved
@br_llm_lock
·
626d
@boazhsan @GaryMarcus @yudapearl @ylecun Idiot,Gary is your usual doomer who relentlessly bashes AI develpoment and uses his fear mongering tactics to stay relevant. Most of his concerns are stupid at best and the guy has zero to negative contribution to AI given the noise he makes,Just another self procliamed AI expert
Boaz Nash
@boazhsan
·
626d
@br_llm_lock @GaryMarcus @yudapearl @ylecun Nirvaan, you sound like an arrogant fool.
Nirvaan Ved
@br_llm_lock
·
626d
@GaryMarcus @yudapearl @ylecun Gary, you are not even qualified to debate with LeCun. Stick to Psychology and Neuroscience. You are not cut for AGI related discussions.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
626d
@yudapearl @ylecun Because LeCun childishly blocked me, I can’t fully participate in this conversation.
Judea Pearl
@yudapearl
·
626d
@ylecun The deep leaning system may be observable and deterministic, fine, but not the environment which this system purports to learn. For starters, cause effect relationships are NOT observable in the environment, nor are agents' intentions and trepidations. @GaryMarcus
Yann LeCun
@ylecun
·
626d
@yudapearl It is much, much easier to investigate what goes on in a deep learning system than in a turbojet, whether theoretically or experimentally.
For starters, the entire state is completely observable with full precision and the dynamics are completely deterministic.

The statement 'I am not even a doomer. You really are an idiot out of his depth.' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about AI development and the qualifications of individuals to participate in such discussions. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, and the intent appears to be to discredit the other participant rather than to contribute constructively to the discussion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using derogatory language ('idiot'). [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others by engaging in name-calling, which can be considered a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it escalates the conflict. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue by resorting to a personal attack rather than addressing the substance of the argument. [-2]