Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement appears to be a critical commentary on a company's valuation, specifically highlighting the perceived lack of revenue, competitive advantage (moat), and state-of-the-art (SoTA) technology. The tone is skeptical and somewhat dismissive, indicated by the use of a shrugging emoji.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the dismissive tone could be seen as undermining the company's efforts without providing constructive feedback. This is a minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical without offering a deeper analysis or constructive suggestions. This is a minor violation. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or specific points for improvement. It also does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. This is a minor violation for lack of constructive criticism. [-1]