Gary Marcus

The statement critiques the performance of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) in a public discussion about its accuracy and reliability. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, aiming to highlight the perceived shortcomings of AGI in consistently providing correct answers.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive and potentially discouraging to those working on AGI. It could be more constructive. [-1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on criticism without offering constructive feedback or solutions. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It could be seen as a personal attack on those working on AGI rather than a critique of the technology itself. [-1]