In reply to:
Yuchen Jin
@Yuchenj_UW
·
624d
The statement 'The act of observation interfered with the observed!' is a response in a conversation about Gary Marcus's views on a public dispute between Elon Musk and Yann LeCun. The statement appears to be a philosophical or scientific comment, possibly referencing the observer effect in quantum mechanics, implying that the act of commenting or observing the dispute has influenced its nature. This statement engages with the public discourse on AI and public figures' disputes, contributing to the civic dialogue.
- The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by introducing a philosophical perspective, which can foster deeper thinking and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.