Gary Marcus

The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse about the reliability and consistency of language models (LLMs) in providing accurate information. The tone is critical and aims to highlight a perceived flaw in LLMs, specifically their inconsistency in answering questions. The conversation includes a series of questions and responses that illustrate this inconsistency.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but criticizes the reliability of LLMs. It is a constructive critique aimed at improving the technology, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by pointing out a specific issue with LLMs, which can lead to better awareness and potential improvements in the technology. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue rather than attacking individuals. [+1]