The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing governance and decision-making within a significant organization, OpenAI. The tone is confrontational and uses strong language to express frustration with the decision-making process. The statement reflects a shift in perspective over time, highlighting a change in stance from advocating for broader representation to a more centralized decision-making approach.
- The use of strong language ('fuckers') is harmful and disrespectful, violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it uses derogatory language to refer to decision-makers. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it expresses frustration and anger. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a personal attack on the decision-makers. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could be seen as using influence to express personal frustration rather than for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity due to the use of offensive language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.