Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
5/28/2024, 5:19:26 PM
X
In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
“We don’t primary an incumbent president,” my ass. Eugene McCarthy and RFK Senior both primaried Johnson. Same with “Anyone but one of us is unqualified.” Their definition of “qualified” is someone qualified to perpetuate the system as it is. Once you surrender your critical…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
The current electoral disaster - Trump high in the polls - was completely preventable. Biden’s anointment was a cynical managerial decision made by a few and acquiesced to by a whole lot of people who should have known better. 5/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
Coup managers keep strict control; a political-media industrial complex polices the system so no one gets past the gates if he or she questions the basic tenets of a corporate controlled economy. “We have to go with Joe because he’s the one who can win” was a ruse from the…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
For the last 50 years, there has been a corporate coup in this country - shattering the promises of democracy, abolishing the middle class and leaving the majority of Americans in some mode of economic struggle. We’ve been living with a sociopath in the house for decades. 3/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
Fascism now definitely threatens. But who do you blame at a certain point - the thief, or the people in the house who opened every door and every window making it so easy for him to come in? 2/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
Franklin Roosevelt said we wouldn’t have to worry about a fascist takeover in this country as long as democracy delivered on its promises. 1/7

The statement 'Sociopaths camouflage themselves in business suits and faux sincerity today, pulling our strings and turning citizens into puppets. It’s all a mind game and right now they’re winning.' is a part of a broader public discourse on political and corporate influence in society. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to highlight perceived manipulation by powerful entities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('sociopaths') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others by labeling individuals as 'sociopaths,' which can be considered a form of verbal harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters a sense of distrust and animosity. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a broad, accusatory tone without specific evidence or constructive suggestions, and it can be seen as a personal attack on those in business and politics. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to raise awareness about perceived societal issues, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the accusatory tone may undermine this goal. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its inflammatory language. [-1]