Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement criticizes legacy media companies for failing their audiences and suggests that major changes are needed. It also mentions the author's recent investment in BuzzFeed and implies that a shakeup is necessary. The tone is critical and suggests a call to action for media companies to improve their practices.
- The statement does not directly harm anyone with words or actions, but it does criticize media companies broadly. This criticism is aimed at encouraging improvement rather than causing harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes the idea of improvement and change within media companies, which can be seen as promoting understanding and better practices. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media companies without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for changes in media companies, the statement uses the author's influence to potentially better the media landscape and, by extension, society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly call for improvements in media practices. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.