Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement addresses a high-profile legal case involving a former president, which is a matter of public concern and thus constitutes public discourse. The tone is accusatory and suggests a predetermined bias against the legal process and its outcomes. The intent appears to be to cast doubt on the integrity of the judicial system and to rally support for a particular viewpoint.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it implies corruption and bias without evidence, which can harm public trust in the legal system. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the prosecutors by labeling them as corrupt without substantiation, which can be seen as a form of harassment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is divisive and accusatory. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes sweeping generalizations and personal attacks. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it uses the platform to spread potentially harmful and unsubstantiated claims. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.