Marianne Williamson

The statement engages in a public discourse about political qualifications and the criteria for political success. It responds to a critique of a political figure's qualifications by comparing them to other political figures and referencing a past election outcome. The tone is defensive and somewhat confrontational, aiming to challenge the initial critique.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the initial critique, which may not promote a constructive dialogue. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy of individuals but engages in a somewhat confrontational manner, which could be seen as a form of verbal sparring rather than respectful discourse. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on defending a political figure by comparing them to others and referencing past successes. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of personal attack by questioning the consistency of the critique, which does not foster constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]