Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 177

The statement addresses a serious and contentious public issue, specifically the impact of war on a population, and uses strong language to characterize the situation as genocide. The tone is urgent and emotional, aiming to draw attention to the severity of the situation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to raise awareness about a serious issue, which can be seen as striving to do no harm. However, the use of the term 'genocide' is very strong and could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. (+1 for raising awareness, -1 for potentially inflammatory language)
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the strong language could be seen as disrespectful to those who might have a different perspective on the issue. (+1 for not engaging in hate speech, -1 for potentially disrespectful language)
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the suffering of a population, but the strong language might polarize rather than unite. (+1 for promoting empathy, -1 for potentially polarizing language)
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not invite constructive dialogue either. (0 points)
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to draw attention to a serious issue, which can be seen as for the betterment of society. (+1 point) [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue, but the strong language could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity. (+1 for free speech, -1 for potentially irresponsible language)