The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the debate over ceasefire and hostage release in the context of an ongoing war. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to highlight a perceived moral failing of those who opposed the pro-ceasefire position.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a shaming tactic which can be seen as harmful to those it targets.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of others by shaming them.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticizing others.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a shaming tactic which can be seen as a form of personal attack.
[-2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as not using the platform responsibly due to its accusatory tone.