Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The Times of Israel
@TimesofIsrael
·
405d
The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the debate over ceasefire and hostage release in the context of an ongoing war. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to highlight a perceived moral failing of those who opposed the pro-ceasefire position.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a shaming tactic which can be seen as harmful to those it targets. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of others by shaming them. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticizing others. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a shaming tactic which can be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as not using the platform responsibly due to its accusatory tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.