Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
6/1/2024, 7:59:10 PM
X
In reply to:
octavian
@olwrnnh
·
618d
@GaryMarcus do you know how exponential curves work
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
618d
“Exponential”, my ass.

GPT was first shown to Gates August 2022

21 months later all we have is GPT-4o
ben
@benzion_b
·
618d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @sama https://www.businessinsider.com/…

The statement in question is a response in a multi-threaded conversation about the development and impact of GPT models, specifically addressing the concept of exponential growth in AI capabilities. The tone of the statement is confrontational and somewhat dismissive, as it challenges the previous commenter to provide evidence while also boasting about personal academic achievements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is dismissive and confrontational, which can be seen as harmful in a public discourse context. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it engages in a form of intellectual one-upmanship that can be perceived as belittling. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it fosters a competitive and dismissive atmosphere. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments by questioning the other person's credentials and achievements. [-2]