In reply to:
Jeremy López 🌻
@JeremyCapoeira
·
531d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
531d
The statement by @JeremyCapoeira and the subsequent reply by the user constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about a significant public issue, namely the conflict in Gaza and the political responses to it.
- The statement does not directly incite harm, but the accusatory tone could contribute to a polarized environment, which might indirectly cause harm. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a confrontational stance. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of personal attack by implying that the other party supports measures that lead to more killing. This is an ad hominem argument. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible due to its confrontational and accusatory tone. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.