In reply to:
LADY BUNNY
@LADYBUNNY77
·
531d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
531d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about public policies related to Israel and Gaza, comparing them to those of Trump and Biden. The tone is critical and aims to draw a parallel between different political figures' policies.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the comparison to Trump could be seen as inflammatory to some audiences. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more critical and comparative. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.