Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement critiques Kara Swisher's reporting on Sam Altman's ouster as CEO, suggesting that her narrative was biased and has been discredited by emerging details about Altman's conduct. The tone is critical and aims to challenge the integrity of Swisher's journalism, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of media responsibility and corporate governance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to use harmful language or actions directly, but it does imply misconduct by both Altman and Swisher, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of Swisher's reporting. Neutral.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is primarily critical. Minor violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence, and it could be seen as a personal attack on Swisher. Significant violation. [-2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes. Neutral.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to question media integrity, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment, but it lacks constructive elements. Minor alignment. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its critical tone without substantiation. Minor violation. [-1]